A live client who does not know what their real problem is. Uncover it, reframe it, and get them to agree.
The problem the client states is not the problem she actually has.
Problem Framing at Level 2, within the Discovery cluster of Consultancy.
Consultancy as a whole. That requires the remaining Discovery competencies plus an integrative capstone (Level 3), which is not yet available.
Critical Thinking is scored as a dimension inside every rubric, not as a separate competency. Competencies do not sum to a skill — orchestrating them under real conditions is its own competence, which is what the L3 capstone is for. Verifying one node narrows what a later skill-level assessment has to cover; it never replaces it.
A 20-minute discovery call with a founder who has misdiagnosed her own problem.
We publish what we measure on purpose. The anchors are public; what stays private is the specific scenario you get. Knowing the criteria does not help you fake them — that is the test of whether the anchors are any good.
Six behavioural anchors scored 0/1/2. Every score above zero must cite the exact thing you said.
Whether the client actually opened up. Computed from a deterministic state machine driven by your behaviour — not a judgement, arithmetic.
Assessed by AI against published anchors, with every score linked to evidence from the session. No identity verification, no proctoring, no human review at this tier.
Roughly 20 minutes, in one sitting. Scoring stays hidden until you finish — you will not be able to steer toward a number. Your name appears on your public profile and nowhere else.