Each skill declares its own assessment format — a live simulation, an artefact you have to defend, a task with a checkable output. Nothing here is multiple choice.
A live client who does not know what their real problem is. Uncover it, reframe it, and get them to agree.
Compose a poster from supplied elements. Then the brief changes, and you have to adapt rather than restart.
A live scenario with a stakeholder who pushes back. Judged on framing, evidence and holding position under pressure.
Elicit what is actually needed from someone who describes solutions instead of needs.
Explain something hard in plain language under a real constraint, then defend the cuts you made.
Model a domain, then justify keys, normalisation and access patterns against a changed requirement.
Read an execution plan, rewrite the query, defend the trade-offs you accepted.
Explain a concept to a persona that keeps asking why until it genuinely understands, or catches that you do not.